This list, maintained by the MLRC Institute, lists incidences in the United States in which online speech is threatened, whether through libel suits, criminal investigations, or other means. If you know of something we missed, please let us know. For more details on this list, see “Notes and Sources” below.
Lee v. Makhnevich
S.D.N.Y.: Toothache lawsuit may stifle medical gag orders against online rants
MSNBC
Lawyers for Robert Lee, 42, this week asked a New York federal court to declare that dentist Stacey Makhnevich's contract, which effectively tries to gag patient's reviews, is unethical, invalid, and illegal.
http://vitals.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/11/30/9124107-toothache-lawsuit-may-stifle-medical-gag-orders-against-online-rants
>>Complaint
http://mlrc.informz.net/z/cjUucD9taT0xOTYxMjI0JnA9MSZ1PTEwMzMyOTU4MDEmbGk9OTIxODMwOA/index.html
U.S. v. Batiste, et al., Crim. No. 06-20373 (S.D.
Status: Gag order modified; Appeal of gag order dismissed by court
Attorney David O. Markus writes the Southern District of Flordia blog (sdfla.blogspot.com) focusing on cases and news involving the court. One of the cases he blogged about was the “
Links and Court Documents:
http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/news.html?news_id=46858
http://sdfla.blogspot.com/2008/01/gag-order-lifted-in-part.html
http://sdfla.blogspot.com/2008/01/gagged.html
11th Circuit petition: http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/images/news_photos/46826/SUIT001.PDF
In The Matter of Four Subpoenas dated October 30, 2007, May 6, 2008, May 6, 2008 and May 8, 2008 (
Status: Subpoenas withdrawn
In January 2008, a Bronx County Assistant District Attorney sent a subpoena to the owners of Room Eight (www.r8ny.com), a group blog focusing on New York City politics, seeking information to identify the authors of 29 blog posts, written by a pseudonymous contributor to the blog, and several anonymous contributors. The subpoena included the warning that disclosure by the site owners of the fact that they had received the subpoena – including telling the effected bloggers -- would impede an unspecified investigation (later revealed to be an investigation of death threats against a local political official), and could be prosecuted. The site owners filed a motion to quash the subpoena, and argued that they should be able to contact the pseudonymous and anonymous bloggers. They also threatened a federal lawsuit. In July, the District Attorney’s office withdrew the subpoena.
Links and Court Documents:
Case documents: http://www.citizen.org/litigation/forms/cases/CaseDetails.cfm?cID=489
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/15/technology/15law.html
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2008/07/room-8-ungagged-dishes-on-bronx-da.html
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2008/07/15/did-das-subpoena-bind-bloggers-to-silence/
http://volokh.com/posts/1216092524.shtml
www.citmedialaw.org/threats/new-york-v-tsabar
http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6718
http://www.r8ny.com/blog/admin/room_eight_fights_bronx_subpoena_wins.html