Righthaven LLC v. Hoehn



UPDATE (9/18/11)



STATUS: On September 18, 2011, Defendant filed a Motion for Write of Execution against the Plaintiff.




D. Nev.: Copyright Trolls Assets Targeted for Seizure

Wired

The legal woes of Las Vegas-based copyright-trolling firm Righthaven continued Sunday when one of its creditors moved to seize its assets.





-- Motion for Writ of Execution: Righthaven v. Hoehn




UPDATE (9/9/11)

STATUS: On September 9, 2011, Plaintiff moved for a Stay of the Court’s Order and Judgment to pay Defendant’s Attorney's fees and costs.



D. Nev.: Righthaven: We Might Have To Declare Bankruptcy



paidContent
Copyright enforcer Righthaven warned that it cannot afford to pay a defendant $30,000 in legal fees and asked a judge to lift a ruling that prevents it from suing other individuals. And, in a man-bites-dog turn of events, Righthaven warned that the aggressive defendant would try and take the firm’s assets if a stay was not granted.
http://paidcontent.org/article/419-righthaven-we-might-have-to-declare-bankruptcy/






-- Motion for Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal: Righthaven v. Hoehn
http://www.scribd.com/doc/64396098/Righthaven-v-Hoehn-Plaintiff-Righthaven-LLC-s-Motion-for-Stay-of-Judgment-Pending-Appeal


UPDATE (8/16/2011)

STATUS: Defendant's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs granted; Plaintiff ordered to pay attorney's fees in the amount of $34,045.50.




D. Nev.: Righthaven rocked, owes $34,000 after "fair use" loss

Ars Technica
In a terse order today, the judge decided that Hoehn had won the case (as the "prevailing party") and "the attorney’s fees and costs sought on his behalf are reasonable."
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/08/righthaven-rocked-owes-34000-after-fair-use-loss.ars?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss







STATUS: Defendant's motion for summary judgment and motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction was granted on June 20, 2011

D. Nev.: Righthaven Loss: Judge Rules Reposting Entire Article Is Fair Use

Wired
A federal judge ruled Monday that publishing an entire article without the rights holder’s authorization was a fair use of the work, in yet another blow to newspaper copyright troll Righthaven. . . “Righthaven did not present any evidence that the market for the work was harmed by Hoehn’s noncommercial use for the 40 days it appeared on the website. Accordingly, there is no genuine issue of material fact that Hoehn’s use of the work was fair and summary judgment is appropriate,” Judge Pro ruled.
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/06/fair-use-defense/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired%2Findex+%28Wired%3A+Index+3+%28Top+Stories+2%29%29&utm_content=Google+Reader

--Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment: Righthaven LLC v. Hoehn
http://randazza.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/righthaven-v-hoehn.pdf


STATUS: Complaint filed Jan 11, 2011

D. Nev.: After 200 Lawsuits Against Sites, Righthaven Targets Online Commenters

paidContent
After suing mostly mom-and-pop web publishers—more than 200 blogs and web sites in all in its 10 months in business—Righthaven last week began suing mere commenters, including Wayne Hoehn, a user who posted an op-ed article at MadJackSports.com . . . The same day, Righthaven sued James Higgins, who posted another apparently copied Las Vegas Review-Journal story into a Google Groups news list. These two suits appear to be the first Righthaven suits against individual who don’t own their own websites.
http://ia700408.us.archive.org/32/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.78697/gov.uscourts.nvd.78697.1.0.pdf

--Complaint: Righthaven v. Hoehn
http://ia700408.us.archive.org/32/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.78697/gov.uscourts.nvd.78697.1.0.pdf

See also:
--Complaint: Righthaven v. Higgins
http://ia700408.us.archive.org/14/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.78696/gov.uscourts.nvd.78696.1.0.pdf

1 comment:

rental mobil said...

Nice article, thanks for the information.